Skip to Content

Supreme Court agrees to hear case of Texas death row inmate seeking DNA testing

Pixabay

By Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter

The Supreme Court agreed Monday to take up the case of death row inmate Rodney Reed, who is seeking post-conviction DNA testing of evidence at the crime scene.

Reed was sentenced to death more than 20 years ago for the assault, rape and strangling of 19-year-old Stacey Lee Stites.

In the case at hand, he seeks to challenge the constitutionality of a state post-conviction DNA statute so that a belt at the scene could be tested. Lower courts said his request is barred because he waited too long to bring the claim.

“The basic question is a technical one about when the clock starts running for federal lawsuits by prisoners who seek DNA testing of newly discovered evidence that might exonerate them,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. “But the implications could be much broader, especially for prisoners in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, where the current law makes it exceedingly difficult to bring such claims.”

Reed’s case has united lawmakers, religious leaders, and celebrities such as Kim Kardashian West and Rihanna in his defense.

The Texas law allows a convicted person to obtain post-conviction DNA testing of biological material if the court finds that certain conditions are met. Reed was denied. He came to the Supreme Court in 2018 and was denied again. Now he is challenging the constitutionality of the Texas law.

But a federal appeals court has held that he waited too long to bring the claim: “An injury accrues when a plaintiff first becomes aware, or should have become aware that his right had been violated.” The court noted that he became aware of that in 2014 and that his current claim is “time barred.”

The Supreme Court had previously declined to take up an appeal from Reed in 2020. At the time, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a statement, noted that he has “presented a substantial body of evidence” that she said “if true” casts doubt on the “veracity of scientific validity of the evidence.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2022 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.

CNN’s Devan Cole contributed to this report.

Article Topic Follows: CNN - US Politics

Jump to comments ↓

Author Profile Photo

CNN Newsource

BE PART OF THE CONVERSATION

KVIA ABC 7 is committed to providing a forum for civil and constructive conversation.

Please keep your comments respectful and relevant. You can review our Community Guidelines by clicking here

If you would like to share a story idea, please submit it here.

Skip to content