‘Still a lot of uncertainty’: Investors react to initial US-China trade deal
Happy Monday. A version of this story first appeared in CNN Business’ Before the Bell newsletter. Not a subscriber? You can sign up right here.
A “phase one” trade deal between the United States and China, announced Friday, has cleared the path for riskier assets to rally through the end of the year.
But investors are still digesting what is and isn’t included in the deal, which lowers the temperature after a fraught year and a half but leaves markets in the dark on what comes next.
“The [‘phase one’] trade deal is positive for the outlook relative to continued trade war escalation, but there is still a lot of uncertainty,” Jim O’Sullivan, chief US macro strategist at TD Securities, said in a note to clients.
The deal still needs to go through a legal review and translation process before it’s signed. But here’s what it includes, according to US officials and others familiar with the agreement:
- The United States canceled an additional round of tariffs on nearly $160 billion of Chinese consumer electronics and toys which had been set to take effect Sunday.
- China has agreed to increase purchases of US goods and services by at least $200 billion over the next two years. That includes $40 billion to $50 billion in farm commitments.
- The United States has agreed to cut tariffs on $120 billion worth of Chinese imports enacted in September to 7.5% from 15%. Earlier tariffs of 25% on $250 billion in Chinese imports remain in place.
- China is said to have agreed to make structural changes to how it deals with intellectual property rights, and will end the practice of forcing American companies to hand off their technology to access the Chinese market. However, details here remain unclear.
Analysts on Wall Street are cheering the agreement as slightly better than they had expected, though there’s some disappointment that the tariff rollbacks didn’t go further.
“Before Trump coined the term ‘phase one,’ we would have described such an agreement as a substantial deal rather than a mere truce,” said Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg.
That said, there’s already chatter about whether the de-escalation can last — especially considering China’s ambitious commitment to significantly boost agricultural purchases.
“Given the peak level of China’s agricultural orders from the US was at $28.7 [billion] per year in 2012 and 2014, an annualized $40 [billion or more] order would be difficult, but perhaps not impossible,” Bank of America’s team of China economists wrote Monday.
And Trump is already talking about shifting gears to “phase two” immediately. That would put concerns about tensions flaring up again back on the table.
Boeing could suspend or curb production of the 737 Max
Boeing is considering suspending or cutting production of the troubled 737 Max jet, my colleague Rene Marsh reports.
A decision could come as soon as Monday after US markets close, according to a source familiar with the decision-making process. “If they make the decision [to suspend] it’s just a temporary pause of the line,” the source said, adding that the production will eventually resume.
We saw this coming: CEO Dennis Muilenburg warned in July that Boeing would be forced to consider slowing or shutting 737 Max production if the plane remained grounded through the end of 2020. And the head of the Federal Aviation Administration said last week that the 737 Max would not be approved to fly again by the end of the year.
Why it’s necessary: Boeing has been building 42 of the jets a month since the grounding in order to avoid layoffs and stay on good terms with its suppliers. But the company has not been able to deliver the planes. That comes at a massive cost to Boeing, since most revenue comes in after that point.
Boeing shares are down more than 2% in premarket trading. The company’s stock is up roughly 6% this year, while the S&P 500 has jumped more than 26%.
Goldman Sachs ends financing for Arctic drilling
Over the weekend, Goldman Sachs announced a raft of changes to its environmental policy — including a pledge not to finance any new upstream oil projects in the Arctic, my CNN Business colleague Hanna Ziady reports.
The policy also extends to financing for new thermal coal mines and coal-fired power plants, though it falls short on fracking, according to the Sierra Club, an environmental organization.
Barclays, UniCredit and Royal Bank of Scotland have made similar commitments. But Goldman Sachs is the first big US bank to make such a call.
Of note: The bank’s decision to tighten its policies on carbon-intensive sectors comes as activists and scientists decried the outcome of a global climate summit in Madrid, saying the resulting pact’s watered-down language failed to deliver clear carbon-cutting commitments.
Up next
The Empire State manufacturing survey for December arrives at 8:30 a.m. ET. That’s followed by the release of the NAHB Housing Market Index at 10 a.m. ET.
Coming tomorrow: The US data continues with housing starts and building permits.
