Skip to Content

Biden orders response to U.S. Supreme Court ‘assault’ on Texas abortion rights

<i>Evan Vucci/AP</i><br/>President Joe Biden
AP
Evan Vucci/AP
President Joe Biden

WASHINGTON, DC -- A new Texas law that effectively bans most abortions prompted President Joe Biden on Wednesday to use a word he'd entirely avoided as president: "Abortion."

The absence of the word in Biden's public remarks and statements has frustrated activists, who say it reflects an issue that fell off the priority list even as women's right to an abortion comes under threat in states across the Midwest and South.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday night formally denied a request from Texas abortion providers to freeze the state law, meaning it will remain on the books for now. Abortion providers in the state have already turned away patients, uncertain of their potential legal exposure.

In a statement Thursday morning, Biden used the word again, harshly criticizing the Texas law as an "unprecedented assault on a woman's constitutional rights."

In far stronger language than he'd employed a day earlier, Biden called the law's novel enforcement structure -- which allows private citizens to bring civil suits against anyone who assists a pregnant person seeking an abortion -- a "bizarre scheme" with the potential to unleash "unconstitutional chaos."

"Complete strangers will now be empowered to inject themselves in the most private and personal health decisions faced by women," he wrote.

Biden said he was launching a "whole of government" effort to respond to the law, tasking the Department of Health and Human Services and the Justice Department "to see what steps the Federal Government can take to ensure that women in Texas have access to safe and legal abortions." He said the effort would be led from within the White House.

As the Texas law that prohibits abortions after six weeks takes effect, Biden is facing pressure to defend abortion rights more aggressively. It's an issue the President has shifted on over the course of his long career, including as a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, when he reversed his stance on a measure allowing federal funds to pay for abortion.

In his two statements on the Texas law, Biden has vowed to find a way to protect a woman's right to choose to have an abortion. Yet the avenues for doing so remain unclear, and so far the White House has been vague on what specific actions might be possible.

Asked Wednesday by reporters what options Biden had available to him, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the President would push Congress to codify Roe v. Wade as law.

"That is a specific course of action that can be taken to help protect from these type of lawsuits in the future," she said.

The prospect of Congress enshrining a right to abortion in law remains a long shot; doing so would require 60 votes in the Senate to overcome a certain Republican filibuster, and even passage in the House is unclear given Democrats' narrowest of majorities.

Biden had already faced calls to support changes to filibuster rules for issues like voting rights but has stopped short of supporting getting rid of the filibuster altogether. In 2018, Democrats successfully used the filibuster to prevent a law banning abortion after 20 weeks when Republicans controlled the House, Senate and White House -- a reminder of how changes to the rules could haunt them down the road if the GOP returns to the majority.

Since taking office, Biden has taken some steps to reverse restrictive abortion rules from the Trump era, including the "Mexico City Policy" banning US funding of international organizations that perform abortions. He also tasked the Department of Health and Human Services to replace a Trump-era rule barring certain federally funded health care providers from referring patients for abortions, a step long demanded by abortion rights groups.

Yet the issue has been far from a driving agenda item for his administration. As a senator, Biden had been among the more moderate Democrats on abortion, including supporting the Hyde Amendment that banned federal abortion funding.

In 2019, as he was vying for the Democratic presidential nomination, Biden said he'd changed his mind, even as he declared he made "no apologies for my last position." Instead, he said he'd reversed his position because largely Republican-led states had enacted strict new abortion laws.

Biden, a Catholic, has also faced criticism from conservative US bishops, who earlier this year sought to enact rules that would deny communion to public figures who support abortion rights.

Biden has shrugged off those attempts, calling it a "private matter" that he did not think would gain traction.

For Biden and his party, the political environment has been deteriorating for weeks. The resurgence of coronavirus infections, rising fears of inflation, and catastrophic images from Afghanistan have pulled down the President's public standing and brightened Republican prospects for regaining control of Congress in the 2022 midterm elections.

The restrictive Texas abortion law, and the Supreme Court's willingness to let it take effect, could alter the political equation in Democrats' favor, some operatives said.

"Democrats will use this to gin up their disillusioned base," said Republican pollster Glen Bolger.

"It's a policy disaster but a political bonanza," observed Mark Mellman, a Democratic pollster who advises party leaders in Congress. "Democrats will finally realize the right to choose is not a settled issue but rather, actually at stake in these elections. They will be fired up, and ready to vote, and anxious to give of their time and money."

As the issue returns to the fore with Texas's new law, Biden is facing renewed calls to endorse an expansion of the Supreme Court after it allowed Texas's restrictive new abortion law to take effect. Biden as a candidate punted on the question, and instead established a commission of experts to weigh that and other ideas for reforming the Supreme Court.

The panel has met three times since it was established in April -- once each in May, June and July. The meetings have occurred virtually, and mostly entail the members and witnesses reading from prepared testimony. They are all available on the White House website.

More meetings are scheduled in the fall, and a report is due by November 15, which is 180 days since the panel's first public meeting.

Officials say the report will not contain recommendations for or against expanding the court or other potential changes. Instead, it will analyze various arguments for and against Supreme Court reform. Officials say it could inform further debate among lawmakers.

Aside from court expansion, the panel has heard arguments over limiting the court's power of judicial review; changing how the court decides which cases to hear; and debated the idea of term limits for justices.

The panel has also engaged on the so-called "shadow docket," which allows the court to make decisions without full public arguments or briefings -- a practice that has come under new scrutiny following the use of the tactic in the Texas case.

In his statement Thursday, Biden also criticized the court for deciding in secret something with major ramifications.

"For the majority to do this without a hearing, without the benefit of an opinion from a court below, and without due consideration of the issues, insults the rule of law and the rights of all Americans to seek redress from our courts," Biden wrote. "Rather than use its supreme authority to ensure justice could be fairly sought, the highest Court of our land will allow millions of women in Texas in need of critical reproductive care to suffer while courts sift through procedural complexities."

The U.S. Supreme Court commission, led by former White House counsel Bob Bauer, was established in April and is comprised of 36 members across an ideological spectrum. Most are professors at elite law schools.

CNN

Comments

35 Comments

  1. The SCOTUS will shoot down this new Texas law. It walks all over the 14th amendment. Amy and Kavanaugh will never approve it. The Marxists in the WH are too drunk with power and control to let the process play out in the 18 months.

  2. You @ssholes at KVI@ can keep deleting my comments but you know that it makes you no better than the Russians and Chinese and their censorship of the truth

  3. The doddering old fool and his admin. will destroy this country if we can’t stop them. The worst thing that could happen is the old fool does’nt wake up from one of his many daily naps. Think about the Hyena harris laughing her way through the duration of his/her term? That is a scary thought. He’s worried about abortions in Texas as the country burns around him, we are screwed

      1. Well sh!t for brains start with a million illegal aliens, we’ve lost energy independence due to this fool, how about the loss of $2 a gal. gasoline, how about a billion dollars in new military equipment lost to a terror group, how about his his head military guy wants to get in bed with the same terrorist’s that killed thirteen of our best? And that’s just the beginning.

        1. 1. Illegal immigration has been with us since the end of the Bracero Program.
          2.We are now an oil exporting nation.
          3.Presidents have absolutely nothing to do with gas prices. Gas is high because producers have inflated prices using power failures on the gulf during the winter as an excuse. Also OPEC controls the price of gas.
          4.Trump surrendered to the Taliban, made a deal to release 5,000 Isis prisoners, and then failed to process exit visas. Trumps actions and his surrender to the enemy resulted in the equipment being left.
          5.Your 5th point is nonsense and deserves no addressing.

          1. Soon you will be driving an electric vehicle and you won’t be concerned with gas prices.

          2. No because at that point electric prices will be outrageous. Electric power is unsustainable and the impact on the environment is much worse. You’re an idiot.

  4. “allow millions of women in Texas in need of critical reproductive care to suffer while courts sift through procedural complexities”?
    Never mind the millions of unborn children that will be given a chance to live, right? Will the Supreme Court speak for them since the women are too busy protecting their bodies but not the bodies of the children?

    1. It’s not reproductive care. If you’re healthy enough to get laid and get pregnant then you’re healthy enough to have the baby. Abortions serve one purpose. An easy out for someone too lazy or too stupid to use contraception. It’s time to end it.

      1. This is insanity. Liberals are now claiming the Texas 6 week law will disproportionately affect the LGBTQ people. Huh? Now that’s a good one. That is something nitwit Charlie Dumbo would say.

  5. After knowing someone who works in that “industry” I can tell you that a large portion of the clients are repeat offenders, basically using the system as a form of birth control. It’s monstrous the way some of these females think and the idiot at the top should try to fix our border, or the rampant crime infecting our cities

  6. Three things the Trumpite Taliban need to understand: 1. Doctors ignore laws against abortion and care for their patients and this will never stop. 2. It’s no one’s business but the patient and the doctor. 3. If you are against abortion,then don’t have one. Simple.

    1. It’s Charlie Dumbo the baby killer. What part of abortion after 6 weeks in Texas is illegal do you not understand? Even SCOTUS didn’t stop the law from taking effect. Doctors will not do anything illegal. They will lose their medical licenses. Don’t mess with Texas.

        1. They don’t get that choice. If we have to follow Bidens ridiculous orders and Congresses ridiculous new leftist anti-America, anti Freedom laws then so do they.

          1. Doctors do not get to break the law just because they are on the evil, hateful, racist, i.e. liberal, side of the political spectrum.

  7. If libbies support abortions and conservatives dont in which case libs will have abortions and conservatives wont. So since libs will (would) spawn more libs isn’t abortion a good thing?

Leave a Reply

Skip to content